We're talking about future of humankind and you make funny remarks. This is...not nice.Scythe wrote:I need an artificial evolution boost to my bra!

But there was indeed something wrong with the title. Edited.
Moderator: Crew
We're talking about future of humankind and you make funny remarks. This is...not nice.Scythe wrote:I need an artificial evolution boost to my bra!
Very interesting post! One dreams about reading only such posts.Railwaymodeler wrote:Nonverbal communication may be the future for humanity. Lies, deception, trickery, those are what blocks our best efforts at creating a peaceful planet. I would go so far as to say that without lies and deception, the fundamental system of Communism may even work. The idea that the sum of society is made up equally by each member will never work so long as the concept of being able to lie and trick others exists.
I imagine it may be very painful for humanity if suddenly introduced. A lot of "dirty laundry" or "skeletons in the closet" would suddenly come out. However, humans are amazingly adaptable; In 1900, scientists pondered what the invention of electricity and the light bulb would do to us. Perpetual daylight, it was thought, would destroy us.
But, whatever does not destroy humanity, can make it stronger.
Perhaps some parts of a nonverbal society are already coming forward, too. Maria and I share a very deep psychological bond, and many times we lay in bed, or sit on the sofa, and almost carry a conversation just looking into each others' eyes, and with slight hand and body movements. Perhaps a sort of first step towards a non-verbal communication system.
Probably you want it as much as everybody on this planet. It's sort of scientific voyeurism. However, and here I would agree, it would be hard to cope with, and this is why I become more and more conservative. Naked facts are interesting from the scientific perspective, but to live the life peacefully it's better to know nothing and be simple. But evolution doesn't want us to be simple and stupid - it shoves more and more deconstructionist, reductionist and behaviourist knowledge into our brains.Pater Alf wrote:I don't want to know what would happen if everybody always has to say the truth.
Well, the whole point is whether it will happen at all; possible benefits or harms are something that you have no influence on. It will either happen or not and what will born from it will be probably also the matter of ongoing debate, similarly to our current debates. Anyway, the sad/happy fact is that things are getting more and more complex and scientifically unexplainable force pushes this process forward.Railwaymodeler wrote:I do believe that over time, a society of linked minds would be an overall benefit to mankind.
Brilliant thought.Railwaymodeler wrote:If we were suddenly thrown in head-first, the pain and hurt from knowing everyone's secrets, particularly of those close to us, would be horrible. But, humans are adaptable, and in time, would learn to behave in such a way that secrets would not exist in the first place. A society where nothing can be kept from anyone, would mean that more than likely we would seriously adjust our behavior as a whole.
If my English was good enough I would probably say the same. Except the part with kid, because I don't have one yet, but I plan to. However, I often think, observing what happens to modern kids who become more and more stupid, aggressive and prone to addictions, is it really worth to have offspring which will probably suffer in a world which it's father doesn't fully accept.Railwaymodeler wrote:I doubt I will live to see it, but perhaps the seeds of it will begin to sprout in Skoda's lifetime. As it is, I often find myself wondering what world she will end up with when she is older and has kids of her own, and what world they too will inherit further down.